RCT: In clinicians of patients with severe aortic stenosis, electronic provider notifications vs usual care improved aortic valve replacement rates at 1 y.
Tanguturi VK, Abou-Karam R, Cheng F, et al. Electronic Provider Notification to Facilitate the Recognition and Management of Severe Aortic Stenosis: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Circulation. 2025 May 27;151(21):1498-1507. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.125.074470. Epub 2025 Mar 30.

BACKGROUND: Symptomatic severe aortic stenosis (AS) remains undertreated with high resultant mortality despite increased growth and availability of aortic valve replacement (AVR) since the advent of transcatheter therapies. We evaluate the impact of electronic provider notifications (EPNs) on rates of AVR at 1 year.

METHODS: In a pragmatic cluster randomized clinical trial conducted within a multicenter academic health system from March 2022 through November 2023, 285 providers who had ordered a transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE) with findings potentially indicative of severe AS with an aortic valve area =1.0 cm2 were enrolled. Providers were randomly assigned to receive EPNs for each of their patients with severe AS on TTE or to usual care. Notifications highlighted the detection of severe AS and included patient-specific clinical guideline recommendations for its management. The primary end point was the proportion of patients with severe AS receiving AVR within 1 year of the index TTE.

RESULTS: A total of 144 providers were randomized to intervention and 141 to control, resulting in 496 and 443 patients assigned to each group, respectively. The patient cohort had mean age of 77±11 years, was 47% female, and had a mean aortic valve area of 0.8±0.1 cm2. Rates of AVR within 1 year were 48.2% with EPNs versus 37.2% with usual care (odds ratio [OR], 1.62 [95% CI, 1.13-2.32]; P=0.009]) and 60.7% and 46.5%, respectively, among symptomatic patients (OR, 1.77 [95% CI, 1.17-2.65]; P=0.006). Notification treatment effect was highest with EPNs for patients >80 years of age (OR, 2.00 [95% CI, 1.17-3.41]; P=0.01), for women (OR, 2.78, [95% CI, 1.69-4.57]; P<0.001), and when the index TTE was performed within the inpatient setting (OR, 2.49 [95% CI, 1.44-4.31]; P<0.001). Within 1 year, the restricted mean survival time was longer with EPNs in all (12 days; P=0.04) and symptomatic patients (23 days; P=0.01).

CONCLUSIONS: In this first study of EPNs for valvular heart disease, EPNs increased rates of AVR for severe AS, lessened sex and age disparities in AVR use, and improved survival time. EPNs may be a simple, scalable intervention to raise awareness of critical TTE findings and improve the quality of care for patients with severe AS.

REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT05230225.

Ratings
Specialty Area Score
Hospital Doctor/Hospitalists
Internal Medicine
Cardiology
Comments from MORE raters

Hospital Doctor/Hospitalists

This pragmatic randomized study of EPN (Electronic Provider Notification) for patients whose TTEs showed severe AS (AV <1.0cm2). From the abstract: "Patients whose clinicians received an EPNs of severe AS, had increased rates of AVR for severe AS, lessened sex and age disparities in AVR use, and improved survival time. EPNs may be a simple, scalable intervention to raise awareness of critical TTE findings and improve the quality of care for patients with severe AS." This approach to clinician notification of critical results proved effective and has the potential for use in other clinical situations where there is a problem with under recognition and under treatment.

Internal Medicine

One of the better examples of nudging that improved patient outcomes.

Comments from JournalWise subscribers

No subscriber has commented on this article yet.