Review: In patients with AF and CAD, double vs triple antithrombotic therapy reduces major bleeding; groups do not differ for mortality, MI, or stroke.
Ravi V, Pulipati P, Vij A, et al. Meta-Analysis Comparing Double Versus Triple Antithrombotic Therapy in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation and Coronary Artery Disease. Am J Cardiol. 2020 Jan 1;125(1):19-28. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2019.09.045. Epub 2019 Oct 11.

Atrial fibrillation (AF) and concomitant coronary artery disease (CAD) create a therapeutic dilemma as the risk of bleeding with triple antithrombotic therapy (TATT) must be balanced against the risk of ischemic events with double antithrombotic therapy (DATT). The aim of this meta-analysis is to compare the efficacy and safety of DATT versus TATT in AF and CAD. MEDLINE, Cochrane, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases were searched for relevant articles published from inception to May 1, 2019. Studies comparing the safety and efficacy of DATT versus TATT in patients with AF and CAD were included. Among 9 studies, where 6,104 patients received DATT and 7,333 patients received TATT, there was no statistically significant difference in the outcomes of mortality, nonfatal myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, and stroke. There was a lower rate of major bleeding in DATT (risk ratio [RR] 0.64 [95% confidence interval [CI] 0.54 to 0.75]; p <0.001). There was no significant difference in stent thrombosis (RR 1.52 [95% CI 0.97 to 2.38]; p?=?0.07). However, subgroup analysis of trials with direct oral anticoagulant use demonstrated a borderline higher rate of stent thrombosis in DATT (RR 1.66 [95% CI 1.01 to 2.73]; p?=?0.05). In conclusion, DATT showed no difference in the outcomes of mortality, stroke, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and stent thrombosis compared with TATT. DATT demonstrated a lower rate of major bleeding. DATT demonstrated a borderline higher rate of stent thrombosis in the subgroup analysis of trials with direct oral anticoagulant which needs to be evaluated in further studies.

Ratings
Specialty Area Score
Hospital Doctor/Hospitalists
Internal Medicine
Cardiology
Hematology
Comments from MORE raters

Cardiology

The changing landscape of anticoagulation, with the shift to DOACs, in CAD patients with AF will require further meta-analyses in the near future. The borderline increase in stent thrombosis with DATT vs TATT mandates careful tailoring to the type of lesion and procedure performed.

Hematology

It is likely that, with a greater number of patients, statistical significance would have been achieved in favor of triple anticoagulation.

Hospital Doctor/Hospitalists

As a hospitalist, I find this type of information is highly relevant when advising my patients on the pros and cons of double vs triple anti-thrombotic therapy in CAD plus A fib.

Comments from JournalWise subscribers

No subscriber has commented on this article yet.